I think this series should be left alone for awhile.
I'm so tired of remakes and do overs.
If every time you missed a period in a book you redid it and re-released it, wouldn't that get seriously old very quick?
Why do we think its okay to undo films?
The first Zombie Halloween was okay, I can't remember what I really think of it, I suppose that says something.
I enjoy the Myers psychological aspects, but then it just turned into lots and lots of annoying screaming.
The sequel is a complete joke!
http://ithinkthereforeireview.blogspot. ... -cons.htmlSo Bad I mean bad is bad woefully!
Halloween 2 (2009) – My husband rarely derides a film, and he called this one ‘a disaster’.
Goodness, this Rob Zombie (House of 1,000 Corpses) sequel was horrible beyond belief.
From the ambiguous dream sequence beginning to the stupid and obvious end (or vice versa), everything about this film is ill conceived.
Scout Taylor Compton (The Runaways) is annoying as hell with her postmodern grunge look, curng therapist rage, and all out screamfeast.
Brad Dourif (Lord of the Rings) and Malcolm McDowell (A Clockwork Orange) do the best with the material they are given, but it’s as if they are playing different men from the characters established in the 2007 remake.
Margot Kidder (Superman) also deserves more than a cameo as a seemingly anine therapist who doesn’t get poor Laurie.
Not that we could see any of this drivel thanks to the dark camerawork, hair in everyone’s face, and more gore gore gore- nor could we hear any of the serious dialogue for all the explove effects and expletive language.
And my goodness did Zombie create this dream vion of Michael’s mother ala Pamela Voorhees just so he could keep his wife Sherri Moon in the sequel?
Despite these being the best-filmed scenes, it all looks like something out of another movie called nepotism.
What else is the point of this overlong waste?