BAD.

Jumper is not a good movie. It was another case where they've got an idea with potential, but don't do anything with it. The Narration in the beginning of the film was just annoying, and the overall script was TERRIBLE. Nothing was explained (which sadly may mean that it's a set-up to a sequel

). The only updes were the jumping effects, a good young actor named Jamie Bell (playing a part which was more interesting than the lead), and the score wasn't bad. I really wish there was more to say... but there really isn't. I didn't find it enjoyable. Don't waste your money. 5/10
Myers31TKD Tuesday 2/19/2008 at 06:58 AM | 2845
I almost went and saw this movie then read a review very milar to yours and decided to make it a no go and rent.

Must be one of the cases where the trailer shows all the goods . . . gh for hollywood.
DaShape Wednesday 2/20/2008 at 02:28 AM | 2862
Yeah. Definately wait and rent it. Or don't rent it, your call. Just don't waste money at the theaters.

;)
Myers31TKD Wednesday 2/20/2008 at 03:57 AM | 2888
I thought that the only good scenes were the ones with SJ fighting the jumpers. -Dexter
Doppelganger Monday 3/10/2008 at 09:15 PM | 4399
I thought that the only good scenes were the ones with SJ fighting the jumpers. -Dexter

I'll agree that those were pretty cool... but the entire movie just didn't fly with me. Like I said, the idea was good... but they just didn't deliver.

Myers31TKD Monday 3/10/2008 at 09:18 PM | 4401
yeah i hate when that happens. Quite a disappointment.

-Dexter
Doppelganger Monday 3/10/2008 at 09:24 PM | 4405